Claim LD12-HQ-C06 (v1.0)
In an audit-style study of 391 NYC employers after Local Law 144 took effect, 18 posted bias-audit reports and 13 posted transparency notices; employer scope discretion means those counts are not a violation rate.
Research opportunities this claim motivates
What this claim leaves open for research. Each is a hypothesis about a gap, not a finding.
- Do AI hiring-audit rules cost small employers more than large ones?Only 18 of 391 employers studied posted audit reports and 13 posted notices, and because employers decide whether their tool is covered these counts are not a violation rate; how this discretion is used across firm sizes is exactly what is unknown.
Provenance and status
- Claim type
- FACT (as printed: “FACT”)
- Publication status
- ELIGIBLE (as printed: “ELIGIBLE”)
- Verification state
- CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY (as printed: “CONTENT VERIFIED”; verified by: UNKNOWN)
- Does not license
- A non-compliance rate or AEDT bias prevalence
- Source (field 6, as printed)
- Wright et al., Null Compliance, FAccT 2024
- Source type (field 7)
- PEER_REVIEWED_CONFERENCE_PAPER (as printed: “Peer-reviewed article”)
- Institutional position
- Independent academic
- Maturity (claim evidence / publication maturity)
- MATURE (as printed: “MATURE”)
- Recorded date
- 2026-09-25
- Currentness / correction
- This is the current version. No correction or concern relation is recorded on its Sources.
Version
Current version v1.0, resolved through the explicit current pointer CLAIM--LD12-HQ-C06.
Pinned Sources (field 6, version-specific)
- “Wright et al., Null Compliance, FAccT 2024” → SRC-LD12-WRIGHT-NULL-COMPLIANCE-2024--v1.0 — Wright et al., “Null Compliance,” FAccT 2024; class PEER_REVIEWED_CONFERENCE_PAPER (explicit public provenance pin)
Read the originals
- SRC-LD12-WRIGHT-NULL-COMPLIANCE-2024: open the original
All 25 canonical Claim fields (raw values and normalized values)
| # | Canonical field | Canonical value (verbatim) | Normalized (Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CLAIM ID | LD12-HQ-C06 | — |
| 2 | PUBLIC-FACING CLAIM | In an audit-style study of 391 NYC employers after Local Law 144 took effect, 18 posted bias-audit reports and 13 posted transparency notices; employer scope discretion means those counts are not a violation rate. | — |
| 3 | CLAIM TYPE | FACT | base_types: FACT |
| 4 | RESEARCH STRAND | B/C/E — Compliance / rights / audit infrastructure | — |
| 5 | MATURITY | MATURE | states: MATURE |
| 6 | SOURCE | Wright et al., Null Compliance, FAccT 2024 | source_ids: SRC-LD12-WRIGHT-NULL-COMPLIANCE-2024 |
| 7 | SOURCE TYPE | Peer-reviewed article | classes: PEER_REVIEWED_CONFERENCE_PAPER |
| 8 | INSTITUTIONAL POSITION | Independent academic | — |
| 9 | SCOPE | NYC Local Law 144; 2023–24 | — |
| 10 | DESIGN | Observational audit | — |
| 11 | SAMPLE / DATASET | 391 employers recorded by 155 investigators | — |
| 12 | MODEL / TOOL / VERSION | AEDTs unspecified | — |
| 13 | COMPARATOR | Visible audit/notice presence | — |
| 14 | MAIN RESULT | 18 audit reports; 13 notices; low accessibility and substantial scope discretion. | — |
| 15 | INFERENTIAL TARGET | Proceduralization and visible compliance | — |
| 16 | DOES NOT LICENSE | A non-compliance rate or AEDT bias prevalence | — |
| 17 | VERIFICATION STATE | CONTENT VERIFIED | state: CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY · verified_by: UNKNOWN |
| 18 | LIMITATIONS | Early period; employer scope classification; NYC only | — |
| 19 | CONTRADICTORY / SUPPORTING SOURCES | NYS Comptroller later documents weak enforcement | — |
| 20 | GEOGRAPHY / LANGUAGE | US-NYC / English | — |
| 21 | DISTRIBUTIONAL LEDGER | Job-seekers bear disclosure-search burden; group outcomes not established | — |
| 22 | R01 / FIELD-MAP LINKS | D6.2, D4b, D2, L-A | — |
| 23 | WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS CLAIM? | Regulator-linked replication or later compliance series | — |
| 24 | PUBLICATION STATUS | ELIGIBLE | state: ELIGIBLE |
| 25 | RECORDED DATE | 2026-09-25 | — |
Field 22 references resolved against Field Map v0.2: D6.2 (SUB_AREA); D4b (SUB_AREA); D2 (DOMAIN); L-A (LENS)
Cited by Living Debate versions
Research-of-record provenance
Materialized by sociolens-materializer 0.6.0 at 2026-09-28T20:00:00.000Z; normalization contract SocioLens — Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2 — Pre-Spike Materialization Contract (v1.0.2). Content seal SHA-256 97db332d6dd6213eb5aebf259699d077289c0503227046b98b7ad6657ee70bf3.
Frozen Drive-derived inputs
- R08 — LD-12 Canonical Claim Ledger v1.0 — LOCKED (v1.0) — Drive ID
1sdIAYxbpV_VV6_xzqmFgCPwej0RadgAopFLRC9iZH5Y; revision: NOT_EXPOSED_BY_DRIVE_TEXT_EXPORT; Drive modified 2026-09-26T06:41:13.718Z; block “ENTRY 06 — LD12-HQ-C06” SHA-256d080872d61b9323420259034e49d3892668b29764f891923267bad997f8b2eb6; SocioLens — Programme Status & Authority Register v0.6 status “CURRENT.”; frozen fixturefixtures/frozen/r08-ld12-claim-ledger-v1.0. - SocioLens — Proof Source Registry v0.4 (v0.4) — Drive ID
1_-GLmj6PfetWDQH2KldMv-61vmSmzdAyyxgZZZCFnbE; revision: NOT_EXPOSED_BY_DRIVE_TEXT_EXPORT; Drive modified 2026-09-27T19:04:00.374Z; block “REGISTRY ENTRY SRC-LD12-WRIGHT-NULL-COMPLIANCE-2024” SHA-25641745af7e42bff59205f9d5dc709322c2d3011145ac13a6f5ff2c40f94a7bd3a; SocioLens — Programme Status & Authority Register v0.6 status “CURRENT PROOF SOURCE REGISTRY.”; frozen fixturefixtures/frozen/proof-source-registry-v0.4.
Builder decisions (not Drive data)
- VERSION = v1.0 — basis: Claim version taken from the canonical ledger artifact version (R08 — LD-12 Canonical Claim Ledger v1.0); Implementation Architecture Selection §5 logical_id/version convention.
- CURRENT_POINTER = true — basis: SocioLens — Programme Status & Authority Register v0.6 status for "R08 — LD-12 Canonical Claim Ledger v1.0 — LOCKED": "CURRENT."
- FIELD_6_SOURCE_REFERENCE = SRC-LD12-WRIGHT-NULL-COMPLIANCE-2024--v1.0 — basis: field 6 of ENTRY 06 — LD12-HQ-C06 cites "Wright et al., Null Compliance, FAccT 2024"; Builder identification: the cited work is Proof Source Registry v0.4 identity SRC-LD12-WRIGHT-NULL-COMPLIANCE-2024 (canonical label "Wright et al., “Null Compliance,” FAccT 2024"), Registry-linked to this logical Claim; SocioLens record v1.0 is its sole record.
- SOURCE_PROVENANCE_PIN = SRC-LD12-WRIGHT-NULL-COMPLIANCE-2024--v1.0 — basis: Issue #5 proof rendering (Architecture Proof Protocol v0.1 AP-08 / Amendment v1.2 §6): explicit version-pinned public provenance of this ClaimVersion — the pinned field-6 Source record.