Claim LD12-HQ-C08 (v1.0)
The CJEU held in C-203/22 that an automated-decision subject is entitled under GDPR to meaningful information about the procedure and principles actually applied; merely handing over a complex formula or algorithm is insufficient.
Provenance and status
- Claim type
- FACT (as printed: “FACT”)
- Publication status
- ELIGIBLE (as printed: “ELIGIBLE”)
- Verification state
- CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY (as printed: “CONTENT VERIFIED”; verified by: UNKNOWN)
- Does not license
- Common use, low procedural burden or successful remedy rates
- Source (field 6, as printed)
- CJEU C-203/22, ECLI:EU:C:2025:117
- Source type (field 7)
- COURT_DECISION_PRIMARY (as printed: “Court decision primary”)
- Institutional position
- EU judiciary
- Maturity (claim evidence / publication maturity)
- MATURE (as printed: “MATURE”)
- Recorded date
- 2026-09-25
- Currentness / correction
- This is the current version. No correction or concern relation is recorded on its Sources.
Version
Pinned version v1.0 (entry LD12-HQ-C08--v1.0) — this page never floats to newer evidence.
This pinned version is also the current version.
Pinned Sources (field 6, version-specific)
- “CJEU C-203/22, ECLI:EU:C:2025:117” → SRC-LD12-CJEU-C203-22-2025--v1.0 — CJEU C-203/22, ECLI:EU:C:2025:117; class COURT_DECISION_PRIMARY (explicit public provenance pin)
Read the originals
- SRC-LD12-CJEU-C203-22-2025: open the original
All 25 canonical Claim fields (raw values and normalized values)
| # | Canonical field | Canonical value (verbatim) | Normalized (Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CLAIM ID | LD12-HQ-C08 | — |
| 2 | PUBLIC-FACING CLAIM | The CJEU held in C-203/22 that an automated-decision subject is entitled under GDPR to meaningful information about the procedure and principles actually applied; merely handing over a complex formula or algorithm is insufficient. | — |
| 3 | CLAIM TYPE | FACT | base_types: FACT |
| 4 | RESEARCH STRAND | C — Rights/remedies | — |
| 5 | MATURITY | MATURE | states: MATURE |
| 6 | SOURCE | CJEU C-203/22, ECLI:EU:C:2025:117 | source_ids: SRC-LD12-CJEU-C203-22-2025 |
| 7 | SOURCE TYPE | Court decision primary | classes: COURT_DECISION_PRIMARY |
| 8 | INSTITUTIONAL POSITION | EU judiciary | — |
| 9 | SCOPE | GDPR automated credit scoring; EU/Austria | — |
| 10 | DESIGN | Legal adjudication | — |
| 11 | SAMPLE / DATASET | Preliminary reference | — |
| 12 | MODEL / TOOL / VERSION | Credit-scoring system | — |
| 13 | COMPARATOR | Controller disclosure | — |
| 14 | MAIN RESULT | Meaningful intelligible explanation standard; confidentiality interests require authority/court balancing. | — |
| 15 | INFERENTIAL TARGET | Content of a formal explanation right | — |
| 16 | DOES NOT LICENSE | Common use, low procedural burden or successful remedy rates | — |
| 17 | VERIFICATION STATE | CONTENT VERIFIED | state: CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY · verified_by: UNKNOWN |
| 18 | LIMITATIONS | Single legal dispute; population uptake unknown | — |
| 19 | CONTRADICTORY / SUPPORTING SOURCES | GDPR doctrine provides stronger realized rights evidence than future AI Act high-risk provisions | — |
| 20 | GEOGRAPHY / LANGUAGE | EU/Austria / multilingual official judgment | — |
| 21 | DISTRIBUTIONAL LEDGER | Litigation burden may advantage well-resourced claimants; incidence unmeasured | — |
| 22 | R01 / FIELD-MAP LINKS | D6.4, D5, D4a, L-A | — |
| 23 | WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS CLAIM? | DPA/court use-rate and remedy-outcome data | — |
| 24 | PUBLICATION STATUS | ELIGIBLE | state: ELIGIBLE |
| 25 | RECORDED DATE | 2026-09-25 | — |
Field 22 references resolved against Field Map v0.2: D6.4 (SUB_AREA); D5 (DOMAIN); D4a (SUB_AREA); L-A (LENS)
Cited by Living Debate versions
Research-of-record provenance
Materialized by sociolens-materializer 0.6.0 at 2026-09-28T20:00:00.000Z; normalization contract SocioLens — Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2 — Pre-Spike Materialization Contract (v1.0.2). Content seal SHA-256 643850f195aa8f06c984fed9dcebd126ff6d6a2b450c879759a9a4f1089d63fd.
Frozen Drive-derived inputs
- R08 — LD-12 Canonical Claim Ledger v1.0 — LOCKED (v1.0) — Drive ID
1sdIAYxbpV_VV6_xzqmFgCPwej0RadgAopFLRC9iZH5Y; revision: NOT_EXPOSED_BY_DRIVE_TEXT_EXPORT; Drive modified 2026-09-26T06:41:13.718Z; block “ENTRY 08 — LD12-HQ-C08” SHA-256f02d270e8dd6e33af09f977819575fd4a9b9369d145a14e8630cc93088afa852; SocioLens — Programme Status & Authority Register v0.6 status “CURRENT.”; frozen fixturefixtures/frozen/r08-ld12-claim-ledger-v1.0. - SocioLens — Proof Source Registry v0.4 (v0.4) — Drive ID
1_-GLmj6PfetWDQH2KldMv-61vmSmzdAyyxgZZZCFnbE; revision: NOT_EXPOSED_BY_DRIVE_TEXT_EXPORT; Drive modified 2026-09-27T19:04:00.374Z; block “REGISTRY ENTRY SRC-LD12-CJEU-C203-22-2025” SHA-25627489143d0ec7f53eea06ccdcc2ad9ca6db0e4be31bc20ab308f2321d4e0c6de; SocioLens — Programme Status & Authority Register v0.6 status “CURRENT PROOF SOURCE REGISTRY.”; frozen fixturefixtures/frozen/proof-source-registry-v0.4.
Builder decisions (not Drive data)
- VERSION = v1.0 — basis: Claim version taken from the canonical ledger artifact version (R08 — LD-12 Canonical Claim Ledger v1.0); Implementation Architecture Selection §5 logical_id/version convention.
- CURRENT_POINTER = true — basis: SocioLens — Programme Status & Authority Register v0.6 status for "R08 — LD-12 Canonical Claim Ledger v1.0 — LOCKED": "CURRENT."
- FIELD_6_SOURCE_REFERENCE = SRC-LD12-CJEU-C203-22-2025--v1.0 — basis: field 6 of ENTRY 08 — LD12-HQ-C08 cites "CJEU C-203/22, ECLI:EU:C:2025:117"; Builder identification: the cited work is Proof Source Registry v0.4 identity SRC-LD12-CJEU-C203-22-2025 (canonical label "CJEU C-203/22, ECLI:EU:C:2025:117"), Registry-linked to this logical Claim; SocioLens record v1.0 is its sole record.
- SOURCE_PROVENANCE_PIN = SRC-LD12-CJEU-C203-22-2025--v1.0 — basis: Issue #5 proof rendering (Architecture Proof Protocol v0.1 AP-08 / Amendment v1.2 §6): explicit version-pinned public provenance of this ClaimVersion — the pinned field-6 Source record.