Private preview. Not published and not indexed.

Claim LD09-SL-C16 (v1.0)

In a large dynamic experiment where each participant saw example ideas from ChatGPT or from earlier participants before brainstorming, high exposure to AI ideas did not make individual ideas more creative but increased the amount and rate of change of collective idea diversity: in the authors’ words, “AI made ideas different, not better”.

Research opportunities this claim motivates

What this claim leaves open for research. Each is a hypothesis about a gap, not a finding.

Provenance and status

Claim type
ESTIMATE (as printed: “ESTIMATE”)
Publication status
ELIGIBLE (QUALIFIED) (as printed: “ELIGIBLE WITH QUALIFIER”)
Verification state
CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY (as printed: “CONTENT VERIFIED”; verified by: UNKNOWN)
Does not license
Effects of co-writing with AI or of AI used as the main source
Source (field 6, as printed)
Ashkinaze, Mendelsohn, Li Qiwei, Budak & Gilbert, “How AI Ideas Affect the Creativity, Diversity, and Evolution of Human Ideas: Evidence From a Large, Dynamic Experiment,” ACM Collective Intelligence 2025, arXiv:2401.13481
Source type (field 7)
PEER_REVIEWED_CONFERENCE_PAPER (as printed: “Peer-reviewed conference paper”)
Institutional position
Independent academic (University of Michigan-led)
Maturity (claim evidence / publication maturity)
EMERGING (as printed: “EMERGING”)
Recorded date
2026-10-15
Currentness / correction
This is the current version. No correction or concern relation is recorded on its Sources.

Version

Current version v1.0, resolved through the explicit current pointer CLAIM--LD09-SL-C16.

Versions:v1.0 · current

Pinned Sources (field 6, version-specific)

All 25 canonical Claim fields (raw values and normalized values)
#Canonical fieldCanonical value (verbatim)Normalized (Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2)
1CLAIM IDLD09-SL-C16—
2PUBLIC-FACING CLAIMIn a large dynamic experiment where each participant saw example ideas from ChatGPT or from earlier participants before brainstorming, high exposure to AI ideas did not make individual ideas more creative but increased the amount and rate of change of collective idea diversity: in the authors’ words, “AI made ideas different, not better”.—
3CLAIM TYPEESTIMATEbase_types: ESTIMATE
4RESEARCH STRANDB — Creative work, writing and ideas—
5MATURITYEMERGINGstates: EMERGING
6SOURCEAshkinaze, Mendelsohn, Li Qiwei, Budak & Gilbert, “How AI Ideas Affect the Creativity, Diversity, and Evolution of Human Ideas: Evidence From a Large, Dynamic Experiment,” ACM Collective Intelligence 2025, arXiv:2401.13481source_ids: SRC-SL-ASHKINAZE-ET-AL-CI-2025
7SOURCE TYPEPeer-reviewed conference paperclasses: PEER_REVIEWED_CONFERENCE_PAPER
8INSTITUTIONAL POSITIONIndependent academic (University of Michigan-led)—
9SCOPEBrainstorming with passive exposure to example ideas—
10DESIGNExperiment in which the pool of example ideas evolves across successive participants; exposure and disclosure varied—
11SAMPLE / DATASETMore than 800 participants from more than 40 countries—
12MODEL / TOOL / VERSIONChatGPT-generated example ideas—
13COMPARATORLow or no exposure to AI ideas—
14MAIN RESULTNo effect on individual idea creativity; higher collective idea diversity under high AI exposure; no main effect of disclosing that ideas came from AI—
15INFERENTIAL TARGETHow seeing AI ideas changes a group’s pool of ideas over time—
16DOES NOT LICENSEEffects of co-writing with AI or of AI used as the main source—
17VERIFICATION STATECONTENT VERIFIEDstate: CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY · verified_by: UNKNOWN
18LIMITATIONSPassive exposure, not co-writing; brainstorming only; read in the arXiv version 3 (July 2025), which states acceptance at ACM Collective Intelligence 2025; the proceedings version was not read—
19CONTRADICTORY / SUPPORTING SOURCESHomogenization when everyone draws from the same model: LD09-SL-C10, LD09-SL-C15—
20GEOGRAPHY / LANGUAGEMulti-country—
21DISTRIBUTIONAL LEDGERNot recorded—
22R01 / FIELD-MAP LINKSLD-09, D3—
23WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS CLAIM?Studies comparing AI as one input among many with AI as everyone’s main source—
24PUBLICATION STATUSELIGIBLE WITH QUALIFIERstate: ELIGIBLE · qualifiers: QUALIFIED
25RECORDED DATE2026-10-15—

Field 22 references resolved against Field Map v0.2: LD-09 (LIVING_DEBATE); D3 (DOMAIN)

Cited by Living Debate versions

Research-of-record provenance

Materialized by sociolens-materializer 0.6.0 at 2026-09-28T20:00:00.000Z; normalization contract SocioLens — Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2 — Pre-Spike Materialization Contract (v1.0.2). Content seal SHA-256 0ef6e7237b6abe239e145010a3482b57f44996cfc68b08223722edd93e321e3e.

Repository-authored inputs (not Drive exports)

  • SocioLens claim — LD09-SL-C16 v1.0 (v1.0) — written in the SocioLens repository by Project Lead (Claude, AI) on 2026-10-15; no Drive identity exists. Authority: AGENTS.md "Authority" (the Project Lead decides research content within the research-integrity rules) and the Owner's choice in the SocioLens project chat on 15 October 2026 to build the LD-09 debate; a new Claim, first version, written from the project's LD-09 source notes, checked against full texts or official abstracts. Block “ENTRY 16 — LD09-SL-C16” SHA-256 ffa632dccc82b10553d38241d9735c584766a2c46df7295bf7c851955a4c6645; fixture fixtures/authored/claims/LD09-SL-C16--v1.0.

Builder decisions (not Drive data)

  • VERSION = v1.0 — basis: Claim version taken from the repository-authored claim fixture version (SocioLens claim — LD09-SL-C16 v1.0); the first version of a new Claim of the LD-09 debate
  • CURRENT_POINTER = true — basis: repository-authored claim "SocioLens claim — LD09-SL-C16 v1.0" (Project Lead (Claude, AI), 2026-10-15); basis: AGENTS.md "Authority" (the Project Lead decides research content within the research-integrity rules) and the Owner's choice in the SocioLens project chat on 15 October 2026 to build the LD-09 debate; a new Claim, first version, written from the project's LD-09 source notes, checked against full texts or official abstracts
  • FIELD_6_SOURCE_REFERENCE = SRC-SL-ASHKINAZE-ET-AL-CI-2025--v1.0 — basis: field 6 of ENTRY 16 — LD09-SL-C16 cites "Ashkinaze, Mendelsohn, Li Qiwei, Budak & Gilbert, “How AI Ideas Affect the Creativity, Diversity, and Evolution of Human Ideas: Evidence From a Large, Dynamic Experiment,” ACM Collective Intelligence 2025, arXiv:2401.13481"; the only field-6 segment of this ClaimVersion's repository-authored ledger block.
  • SOURCE_PROVENANCE_PIN = SRC-SL-ASHKINAZE-ET-AL-CI-2025--v1.0 — basis: explicit version-pinned public provenance of this ClaimVersion (Amendment v1.2 §6): the pinned field-6 Source record "Ashkinaze, Mendelsohn, Li Qiwei, Budak & Gilbert, “How AI Ideas Affect the Creativity, Diversity, and Evolution of Human Ideas: Evidence From a Large, Dynamic Experiment,” ACM Collective Intelligence 2025, arXiv:2401.13481".