Private preview. Not published and not indexed.

Claim LD09-SL-C05 (v1.0)

Across arXiv, bioRxiv and SSRN preprints (2018–2024), authors whose abstracts first showed signs of language-model writing then posted 36.2%, 52.9% and 59.8% more papers respectively; for their manuscripts, more complex writing went with lower odds of publication, the reverse of the pattern for human-written ones; and adopters drew on “more diverse prior work”, being 11.9% more likely to cite books and citing younger documents.

Research opportunities this claim motivates

What this claim leaves open for research. Each is a hypothesis about a gap, not a finding.

Provenance and status

Claim type
ESTIMATE (as printed: “ESTIMATE”)
Publication status
ELIGIBLE (SOURCE_POSITION) (as printed: “ELIGIBLE WITH SOURCE-POSITION QUALIFIER”)
Verification state
CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY (as printed: “CONTENT VERIFIED”; verified by: UNKNOWN)
Does not license
A causal effect (the authors “do not provide causal identification”), any change in research quality, or a collective narrowing
Source (field 6, as printed)
Kusumegi, Yang, Ginsparg, de Vaan, Stuart & Yin, “Scientific production in the era of large language models,” Science 390, 2025 (author version arXiv:2601.13187)
Source type (field 7)
PEER_REVIEWED_JOURNAL_ARTICLE (as printed: “Peer-reviewed journal article (author version)”)
Institutional position
Independent academic (Cornell University and UC Berkeley Haas School of Business); a co-author founded arXiv, whose access logs the study uses
Maturity (claim evidence / publication maturity)
CONTESTED (as printed: “CONTESTED”)
Recorded date
2026-10-15
Currentness / correction
This is the current version. No correction or concern relation is recorded on its Sources.

Version

Current version v1.0, resolved through the explicit current pointer CLAIM--LD09-SL-C05.

Versions:v1.0 · current

Pinned Sources (field 6, version-specific)

All 25 canonical Claim fields (raw values and normalized values)
#Canonical fieldCanonical value (verbatim)Normalized (Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2)
1CLAIM IDLD09-SL-C05—
2PUBLIC-FACING CLAIMAcross arXiv, bioRxiv and SSRN preprints (2018–2024), authors whose abstracts first showed signs of language-model writing then posted 36.2%, 52.9% and 59.8% more papers respectively; for their manuscripts, more complex writing went with lower odds of publication, the reverse of the pattern for human-written ones; and adopters drew on “more diverse prior work”, being 11.9% more likely to cite books and citing younger documents.—
3CLAIM TYPEESTIMATEbase_types: ESTIMATE
4RESEARCH STRANDA — Science and scholarship—
5MATURITYCONTESTEDstates: CONTESTED
6SOURCEKusumegi, Yang, Ginsparg, de Vaan, Stuart & Yin, “Scientific production in the era of large language models,” Science 390, 2025 (author version arXiv:2601.13187)source_ids: SRC-SL-KUSUMEGI-ET-AL-SCIENCE-2025
7SOURCE TYPEPeer-reviewed journal article (author version)classes: PEER_REVIEWED_JOURNAL_ARTICLE
8INSTITUTIONAL POSITIONIndependent academic (Cornell University and UC Berkeley Haas School of Business); a co-author founded arXiv, whose access logs the study uses—
9SCOPEPreprints in the natural sciences, computer science, economics and, through SSRN, the social sciences, law and humanities—
10DESIGNStacked event study around each author’s first flagged month; difference-in-differences for citation behaviour—
11SAMPLE / DATASETAbout 2.1 million preprints; author panels of 109,965 (arXiv), 43,218 (bioRxiv) and 15,370 (SSRN); 246 million arXiv access logs—
12MODEL / TOOL / VERSIONThe authors’ own detector of language-model text in abstracts—
13COMPARATORThe same authors before their first flagged paper, and similar authors not flagged as users—
14MAIN RESULTOutput +36.2% (arXiv), +52.9% (bioRxiv), +59.8% (SSRN), ranging 23.7–89.3% by field and author background; for language-model-assisted manuscripts, more complex writing predicts lower odds of publication, reversing the pattern for human-written ones; adopters are 11.9% more likely to cite books (not significant on SSRN), cite documents 0.379 years younger on average, with no evidence that the cited work is more impactful—
15INFERENTIAL TARGETHow language-model use changes the quantity of scientific output and the reading behind it—
16DOES NOT LICENSEA causal effect (the authors “do not provide causal identification”), any change in research quality, or a collective narrowing—
17VERIFICATION STATECONTENT VERIFIEDstate: CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY · verified_by: UNKNOWN
18LIMITATIONSRead in the authors’ version on arXiv, not the typeset journal text; the detector misses heavily edited text; the dating of adoption is disputed (LD09-SL-C06); arXiv’s founder is a co-author and arXiv’s own logs are used—
19CONTRADICTORY / SUPPORTING SOURCESMethod dispute: LD09-SL-C06; earlier narrowing with online search: LD09-SL-C03—
20GEOGRAPHY / LANGUAGEGlobal / English—
21DISTRIBUTIONAL LEDGERThe largest gains were for authors with Asian names at institutions in Asia (up to 89.3%), the smallest for authors with Caucasian names in English-speaking countries (23.7%)—
22R01 / FIELD-MAP LINKSLD-09, D3—
23WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS CLAIM?A design that dates adoption independently of output, or evidence that the extra papers are not published—
24PUBLICATION STATUSELIGIBLE WITH SOURCE-POSITION QUALIFIERstate: ELIGIBLE · qualifiers: SOURCE_POSITION
25RECORDED DATE2026-10-15—

Field 22 references resolved against Field Map v0.2: LD-09 (LIVING_DEBATE); D3 (DOMAIN)

Cited by Living Debate versions

Research-of-record provenance

Materialized by sociolens-materializer 0.6.0 at 2026-09-28T20:00:00.000Z; normalization contract SocioLens — Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2 — Pre-Spike Materialization Contract (v1.0.2). Content seal SHA-256 4305dfb9cd86b7c1e4c50d5ddac7399e45476e534db6ff582af6ec023c3eeca0.

Repository-authored inputs (not Drive exports)

  • SocioLens claim — LD09-SL-C05 v1.0 (v1.0) — written in the SocioLens repository by Project Lead (Claude, AI) on 2026-10-15; no Drive identity exists. Authority: AGENTS.md "Authority" (the Project Lead decides research content within the research-integrity rules) and the Owner's choice in the SocioLens project chat on 15 October 2026 to build the LD-09 debate; a new Claim, first version, written from the project's LD-09 source notes, checked against full texts or official abstracts. Block “ENTRY 05 — LD09-SL-C05” SHA-256 6e38aaff612e96e729224f56a95cb310f2725c57b4a1651b08487c67e21bc59a; fixture fixtures/authored/claims/LD09-SL-C05--v1.0.

Builder decisions (not Drive data)

  • VERSION = v1.0 — basis: Claim version taken from the repository-authored claim fixture version (SocioLens claim — LD09-SL-C05 v1.0); the first version of a new Claim of the LD-09 debate
  • CURRENT_POINTER = true — basis: repository-authored claim "SocioLens claim — LD09-SL-C05 v1.0" (Project Lead (Claude, AI), 2026-10-15); basis: AGENTS.md "Authority" (the Project Lead decides research content within the research-integrity rules) and the Owner's choice in the SocioLens project chat on 15 October 2026 to build the LD-09 debate; a new Claim, first version, written from the project's LD-09 source notes, checked against full texts or official abstracts
  • FIELD_6_SOURCE_REFERENCE = SRC-SL-KUSUMEGI-ET-AL-SCIENCE-2025--v1.0 — basis: field 6 of ENTRY 05 — LD09-SL-C05 cites "Kusumegi, Yang, Ginsparg, de Vaan, Stuart & Yin, “Scientific production in the era of large language models,” Science 390, 2025 (author version arXiv:2601.13187)"; the only field-6 segment of this ClaimVersion's repository-authored ledger block.
  • SOURCE_PROVENANCE_PIN = SRC-SL-KUSUMEGI-ET-AL-SCIENCE-2025--v1.0 — basis: explicit version-pinned public provenance of this ClaimVersion (Amendment v1.2 §6): the pinned field-6 Source record "Kusumegi, Yang, Ginsparg, de Vaan, Stuart & Yin, “Scientific production in the era of large language models,” Science 390, 2025 (author version arXiv:2601.13187)".