Private preview. Not published and not indexed.

Claim LD08-SL-C17 (v1.0)

Anthropic’s first Economic Index report classified Claude conversations as 57% augmentation and 43% automation; the classifications were made by Claude and checked by the authors on 150 hand-validated conversations drawn from those for which users had submitted feedback, with 90.7% agreement on the augmentation–automation label and 86% to 95.3% acceptable task assignments by level of detail.

Research opportunities this claim motivates

What this claim leaves open for research. Each is a hypothesis about a gap, not a finding.

Provenance and status

Claim type
ESTIMATE (as printed: “ESTIMATE”)
Publication status
ELIGIBLE (SOURCE_POSITION) (as printed: “ELIGIBLE WITH SOURCE-POSITION QUALIFIER”)
Verification state
CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY (PREPRINT) (as printed: “CONTENT VERIFIED PREPRINT”; verified by: UNKNOWN)
Does not license
A description of AI use in general or on other platforms, which the authors say may differ
Source (field 6, as printed)
Handa, Tamkin, McCain, Huang, Durmus et al., “Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations,” arXiv:2503.04761, 2025
Source type (field 7)
PREPRINT (as printed: “Preprint”)
Institutional position
AI developer self-report (Anthropic, the developer of the model that drafted this debate)
Maturity (claim evidence / publication maturity)
EMERGING (as printed: “EMERGING”)
Recorded date
2026-10-16
Currentness / correction
This is the current version. No correction or concern relation is recorded on its Sources.

Version

Current version v1.0, resolved through the explicit current pointer CLAIM--LD08-SL-C17.

Versions:v1.0 · current

Pinned Sources (field 6, version-specific)

All 25 canonical Claim fields (raw values and normalized values)
#Canonical fieldCanonical value (verbatim)Normalized (Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2)
1CLAIM IDLD08-SL-C17—
2PUBLIC-FACING CLAIMAnthropic’s first Economic Index report classified Claude conversations as 57% augmentation and 43% automation; the classifications were made by Claude and checked by the authors on 150 hand-validated conversations drawn from those for which users had submitted feedback, with 90.7% agreement on the augmentation–automation label and 86% to 95.3% acceptable task assignments by level of detail.—
3CLAIM TYPEESTIMATEbase_types: ESTIMATE
4RESEARCH STRANDB — Data and access—
5MATURITYEMERGINGstates: EMERGING
6SOURCEHanda, Tamkin, McCain, Huang, Durmus et al., “Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations,” arXiv:2503.04761, 2025source_ids: SRC-SL-HANDA-ET-AL-ARXIV-2503-04761
7SOURCE TYPEPreprintclasses: PREPRINT
8INSTITUTIONAL POSITIONAI developer self-report (Anthropic, the developer of the model that drafted this debate)—
9SCOPEClaude.ai Free and Pro conversations, December 2024 to January 2025—
10DESIGNModel-based mapping of conversations to occupational tasks (O*NET) and to modes of collaboration—
11SAMPLE / DATASETOver 4 million conversations; 150 hand-validated examples per classification—
12MODEL / TOOL / VERSIONClaude models, via Clio—
13COMPARATORNot applicable—
14MAIN RESULT57% augmentation, 43% automation; about 36% of occupations use AI for at least a quarter of their tasks; validation 95.3% (top level), 91.3% (middle), 86% (task level); 90.7% for the automation–augmentation label—
15INFERENTIAL TARGETWhat tasks people use one developer’s AI system for—
16DOES NOT LICENSEA description of AI use in general or on other platforms, which the authors say may differ—
17VERIFICATION STATECONTENT VERIFIED PREPRINTstate: CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY · qualifiers: PREPRINT · verified_by: UNKNOWN
18LIMITATIONSRead in arXiv version 1; validation sample drawn from feedback conversations, which may not represent all use; data are 7-day snapshots; one platform; the authors say the true augmentation share may be even higher and list these limits themselves—
19CONTRADICTORY / SUPPORTING SOURCESLD08-SL-C18; LD08-SL-C21—
20GEOGRAPHY / LANGUAGEGlobal platform / English—
21DISTRIBUTIONAL LEDGEROccupational coverage is uneven; O*NET is US-centric—
22R01 / FIELD-MAP LINKSLD-08, D3, D2—
23WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS CLAIM?An independent re-classification of comparable conversation data—
24PUBLICATION STATUSELIGIBLE WITH SOURCE-POSITION QUALIFIERstate: ELIGIBLE · qualifiers: SOURCE_POSITION
25RECORDED DATE2026-10-16—

Field 22 references resolved against Field Map v0.2: LD-08 (LIVING_DEBATE); D3 (DOMAIN); D2 (DOMAIN)

Cited by Living Debate versions

Research-of-record provenance

Materialized by sociolens-materializer 0.6.0 at 2026-09-28T20:00:00.000Z; normalization contract SocioLens — Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2 — Pre-Spike Materialization Contract (v1.0.2). Content seal SHA-256 769e196321944f0badbf6b24fe45b3d157fab479a06596e470aa860e0a07e98a.

Repository-authored inputs (not Drive exports)

  • SocioLens claim — LD08-SL-C17 v1.0 (v1.0) — written in the SocioLens repository by Project Lead (Claude, AI) on 2026-10-16; no Drive identity exists. Authority: AGENTS.md "Authority" (the Project Lead decides research content within the research-integrity rules) and the Owner's choice in the SocioLens project chat on 16 October 2026 to build the LD-08 debate; a new Claim, first version, written from the project's LD-08 source notes, checked against full texts, official web pages or official abstracts. Block “ENTRY 17 — LD08-SL-C17” SHA-256 8fd5ec132c2b774aee790caf718c961366aec8ea783126230aed21ddb6dcbb60; fixture fixtures/authored/claims/LD08-SL-C17--v1.0.

Builder decisions (not Drive data)

  • VERSION = v1.0 — basis: Claim version taken from the repository-authored claim fixture version (SocioLens claim — LD08-SL-C17 v1.0); the first version of a new Claim of the LD-08 debate
  • CURRENT_POINTER = true — basis: repository-authored claim "SocioLens claim — LD08-SL-C17 v1.0" (Project Lead (Claude, AI), 2026-10-16); basis: AGENTS.md "Authority" (the Project Lead decides research content within the research-integrity rules) and the Owner's choice in the SocioLens project chat on 16 October 2026 to build the LD-08 debate; a new Claim, first version, written from the project's LD-08 source notes, checked against full texts, official web pages or official abstracts
  • FIELD_6_SOURCE_REFERENCE = SRC-SL-HANDA-ET-AL-ARXIV-2503-04761--v1.0 — basis: field 6 of ENTRY 17 — LD08-SL-C17 cites "Handa, Tamkin, McCain, Huang, Durmus et al., “Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations,” arXiv:2503.04761, 2025"; the only field-6 segment of this ClaimVersion's repository-authored ledger block.
  • SOURCE_PROVENANCE_PIN = SRC-SL-HANDA-ET-AL-ARXIV-2503-04761--v1.0 — basis: explicit version-pinned public provenance of this ClaimVersion (Amendment v1.2 §6): the pinned field-6 Source record "Handa, Tamkin, McCain, Huang, Durmus et al., “Which Economic Tasks are Performed with AI? Evidence from Millions of Claude Conversations,” arXiv:2503.04761, 2025".