Private preview. Not published and not indexed.

Claim LD07-HQ-C01 (v1.0)

High annotation accuracy does not by itself guarantee valid downstream inference; treating imperfect predicted labels as observed variables can bias estimates and invalidate confidence intervals, while design-based validation with a probability-sampled human-labelled subset can restore valid inference under stated assumptions.

Provenance and status

Claim type
FACT (as printed: “FACT”)
Publication status
ELIGIBLE (as printed: “ELIGIBLE”)
Verification state
CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY (as printed: “CLEARED”; verified by: UNKNOWN)
Does not license
Claim that human labels are construct-valid; claim that every task requires DSL; skipping human validation
Source (field 6, as printed)
Egami, Hinck, Stewart & Wei, “Using Imperfect Surrogates for Downstream Inference: Design-based Supervised Learning for Social Science Applications of Large Language Models,” NeurIPS 2023.
Source type (field 7)
PEER_REVIEWED_CONFERENCE_PAPER (as printed: “Peer-reviewed conference methods paper”)
Institutional position
Independent academic
Maturity (claim evidence / publication maturity)
RAPIDLY_MATURING (as printed: “RAPIDLY MATURING”)
Recorded date
2026-09-25
Currentness / correction
This is the current version. No correction or concern relation is recorded on its Sources.

Version

Pinned version v1.0 (entry LD07-HQ-C01--v1.0) — this page never floats to newer evidence.

This pinned version is also the current version.

Versions:v1.0 · current

Pinned Sources (field 6, version-specific)

Read the originals

All 25 canonical Claim fields (raw values and normalized values)
#Canonical fieldCanonical value (verbatim)Normalized (Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2)
1CLAIM IDLD07-HQ-C01—
2PUBLIC-FACING CLAIMHigh annotation accuracy does not by itself guarantee valid downstream inference; treating imperfect predicted labels as observed variables can bias estimates and invalidate confidence intervals, while design-based validation with a probability-sampled human-labelled subset can restore valid inference under stated assumptions.—
3CLAIM TYPEFACTbase_types: FACT
4RESEARCH STRANDA — Annotation/coding/classification—
5MATURITYRAPIDLY MATURINGstates: RAPIDLY_MATURING
6SOURCEEgami, Hinck, Stewart & Wei, “Using Imperfect Surrogates for Downstream Inference: Design-based Supervised Learning for Social Science Applications of Large Language Models,” NeurIPS 2023.source_ids: SRC-LD07-EGAMI-DOWNSTREAM-INFERENCE-2023
7SOURCE TYPEPeer-reviewed conference methods paperclasses: PEER_REVIEWED_CONFERENCE_PAPER
8INSTITUTIONAL POSITIONIndependent academic—
9SCOPEDownstream inference using predicted text labels across CSS tasks—
10DESIGNDesign-based statistical methods + benchmark evaluation—
11SAMPLE / DATASET18 computational social-science tasks—
12MODEL / TOOL / VERSIONSurrogate classifiers / GPT-era predicted labels; claim is method-general—
13COMPARATORHigh-quality gold labels—
14MAIN RESULTDirect surrogate use yields substantial bias/invalid CIs even at 80–90% accuracy; DSL produces low bias and approximately nominal coverage under assumptions—
15INFERENTIAL TARGETCoefficients and confidence intervals using predicted variables—
16DOES NOT LICENSEClaim that human labels are construct-valid; claim that every task requires DSL; skipping human validation—
17VERIFICATION STATECLEAREDstate: CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY · verified_by: UNKNOWN
18LIMITATIONSRequires corpus up front, probability-sampled gold labels and design assumptions; gold assumed high quality—
19CONTRADICTORY / SUPPORTING SOURCESSupported conceptually by Baumann; Yang; Moore—
20GEOGRAPHY / LANGUAGEPrimarily English CSS benchmarks—
21DISTRIBUTIONAL LEDGERSubgroup validity depends on gold-sample design; not independently established here—
22R01 / FIELD-MAP LINKST1, D9, R-1—
23WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS CLAIM?Demonstration that direct predicted-label inference remains calibrated across broad tasks without correction—
24PUBLICATION STATUSELIGIBLEstate: ELIGIBLE
25RECORDED DATE2026-09-25—

Field 22 references resolved against Field Map v0.2: T1 (TENSION); D9 (DOMAIN); R-1 (LENS)

Cited by Living Debate versions

Research-of-record provenance

Materialized by sociolens-materializer 0.6.0 at 2026-09-28T20:00:00.000Z; normalization contract SocioLens — Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2 — Pre-Spike Materialization Contract (v1.0.2). Content seal SHA-256 67506bc7b194154a61f3b79024bbcd1b8e1eb4e40ff0da52b4b769eb5ee11438.

Frozen Drive-derived inputs

  • R03 — LD-07 Canonical Claim Ledger v1.0 — LOCKED (v1.0) — Drive ID 1xVz_LrQAA8EA1tPhVWIrDgOUU3Zidlg9; revision: NOT_EXPOSED_BY_DRIVE_TEXT_EXPORT; Drive modified 2026-09-29T04:31:14.120Z; block “ENTRY 01 — LD07-HQ-C01” SHA-256 9e7ed2974a51b2cda1aa8188a97e45c44666f78ee75b2ccb6a7c44a51e2a903c; SocioLens — Programme Status & Authority Register v0.6 status “CURRENT.”; frozen fixture fixtures/frozen/r03-ld07-claim-ledger-v1.0-canonical.

Builder decisions (not Drive data)

  • VERSION = v1.0 — basis: Claim version taken from the canonical ledger artifact version (R03 — LD-07 Canonical Claim Ledger v1.0); Implementation Architecture Selection §5
  • CURRENT_POINTER = true — basis: SocioLens — Programme Status & Authority Register v0.6 status for "R03 — LD-07 Canonical Claim Ledger v1.0 — LOCKED": "CURRENT."
  • FIELD_6_SOURCE_REFERENCE = SRC-LD07-EGAMI-DOWNSTREAM-INFERENCE-2023--v1.0 — basis: field 6 of ENTRY 01 — LD07-HQ-C01 cites "Egami, Hinck, Stewart & Wei, “Using Imperfect Surrogates for Downstream Inference: Design-based Supervised Learning for Social Science Applications of Large Language Models,” NeurIPS 2023."; the frozen field-6 segment of this ClaimVersion's ledger block; Drive-derived identity authority (Issue #39 Source inventory): Batch 01 §1 "Primary source:" + publication status "PEER-REVIEWED CONFERENCE PAPER"; ledger C01 fields 6/7/8; KEY EVIDENCE.
  • SOURCE_PROVENANCE_PIN = SRC-LD07-EGAMI-DOWNSTREAM-INFERENCE-2023--v1.0 — basis: Issue #5 proof rendering (Architecture Proof Protocol v0.1 AP-08 / Amendment v1.2 §6): explicit version-pinned public provenance of this ClaimVersion — the pinned field-6 Source record "Egami, Hinck, Stewart & Wei, “Using Imperfect Surrogates for Downstream Inference: Design-based Supervised Learning for Social Science Applications of Large Language Models,” NeurIPS 2023."; Drive-derived identity authority (Issue #39 Source inventory): Batch 01 §1 "Primary source:" + publication status "PEER-REVIEWED CONFERENCE PAPER"; ledger C01 fields 6/7/8; KEY EVIDENCE.