Claim LD03-SL-C09 (v1.0)
In paired interviews with 54 developers in 27 teams at a large software company committed to AI adoption, the authors identify a 'Productivity Pressure Paradox': management expected rapid productivity gains without supporting learning, which left developers without the time to build the skills that would save time.
Provenance and status
- Claim type
- FACT + INTERPRETATION (as printed: “FACT + INTERPRETATION”)
- Publication status
- ELIGIBLE (INSTITUTIONAL_POSITION) (as printed: “ELIGIBLE WITH INSTITUTIONAL-POSITION QUALIFIER”)
- Verification state
- CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY (as printed: “CONTENT VERIFIED”; verified by: UNKNOWN)
- Does not license
- Prevalence; measured productivity; statistical causal claims (the authors say so)
- Source (field 6, as printed)
- Miller, Choudhuri, Ulloa et al., “‘Maybe We Need Some More Examples:’ Individual and Team Drivers of Developer GenAI Tool Use,” Proceedings of ICSE 2026
- Source type (field 7)
- PEER_REVIEWED_CONFERENCE_PAPER (as printed: “Peer-reviewed conference paper”)
- Institutional position
- Mixed
- Maturity (claim evidence / publication maturity)
- EMERGING (as printed: “EMERGING”)
- Recorded date
- 2026-10-15
- Currentness / correction
- This is the current version. No correction or concern relation is recorded on its Sources.
Version
Pinned version v1.0 (entry LD03-SL-C09--v1.0) — this page never floats to newer evidence.
This pinned version is also the current version.
Pinned Sources (field 6, version-specific)
- “Miller, Choudhuri, Ulloa et al., “‘Maybe We Need Some More Examples:’ Individual and Team Drivers of Developer GenAI Tool Use,” Proceedings of ICSE 2026” → SRC-SL-MILLER-ET-AL-ICSE-2026--v1.0 — Miller, Choudhuri, Ulloa et al., “‘Maybe We Need Some More Examples:’ Individual and Team Drivers of Developer GenAI Tool Use,” Proceedings of ICSE 2026; class PEER_REVIEWED_CONFERENCE_PAPER (explicit public provenance pin)
All 25 canonical Claim fields (raw values and normalized values)
| # | Canonical field | Canonical value (verbatim) | Normalized (Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CLAIM ID | LD03-SL-C09 | — |
| 2 | PUBLIC-FACING CLAIM | In paired interviews with 54 developers in 27 teams at a large software company committed to AI adoption, the authors identify a 'Productivity Pressure Paradox': management expected rapid productivity gains without supporting learning, which left developers without the time to build the skills that would save time. | — |
| 3 | CLAIM TYPE | FACT + INTERPRETATION | base_types: FACT, INTERPRETATION |
| 4 | RESEARCH STRAND | E — Organizational practice and decoupling | — |
| 5 | MATURITY | EMERGING | states: EMERGING |
| 6 | SOURCE | Miller, Choudhuri, Ulloa et al., “‘Maybe We Need Some More Examples:’ Individual and Team Drivers of Developer GenAI Tool Use,” Proceedings of ICSE 2026 | source_ids: SRC-SL-MILLER-ET-AL-ICSE-2026 |
| 7 | SOURCE TYPE | Peer-reviewed conference paper | classes: PEER_REVIEWED_CONFERENCE_PAPER |
| 8 | INSTITUTIONAL POSITION | Mixed | — |
| 9 | SCOPE | One unnamed large multinational software company; developers mainly in the US, also China, Kenya and others | — |
| 10 | DESIGN | Paired qualitative interviews, one frequent and one infrequent user per team, selected from tool telemetry | — |
| 11 | SAMPLE / DATASET | 54 developers in 27 teams | — |
| 12 | MODEL / TOOL / VERSION | GitHub Copilot | — |
| 13 | COMPARATOR | Frequent versus infrequent users in the same team | — |
| 14 | MAIN RESULT | Uneven adoption within teams; productivity expectations from management without learning support undermine the gains that motivate adoption | — |
| 15 | INFERENTIAL TARGET | Individual and team conditions of developer generative-AI use | — |
| 16 | DOES NOT LICENSE | Prevalence; measured productivity; statistical causal claims (the authors say so) | — |
| 17 | VERIFICATION STATE | CONTENT VERIFIED | state: CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY · verified_by: UNKNOWN |
| 18 | LIMITATIONS | One pro-AI firm; self-selected participants; usage measured for one tool; five of nine authors are Microsoft employees and the unnamed company is very likely Microsoft | — |
| 19 | CONTRADICTORY / SUPPORTING SOURCES | Consistent with case evidence that organizations do not invest in training | — |
| 20 | GEOGRAPHY / LANGUAGE | Multi-country | — |
| 21 | DISTRIBUTIONAL LEDGER | Not analysed in this claim | — |
| 22 | R01 / FIELD-MAP LINKS | LD-03, D2 | — |
| 23 | WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS CLAIM? | Studies at firms that invest in learning support and see adoption converge | — |
| 24 | PUBLICATION STATUS | ELIGIBLE WITH INSTITUTIONAL-POSITION QUALIFIER | state: ELIGIBLE · qualifiers: INSTITUTIONAL_POSITION |
| 25 | RECORDED DATE | 2026-10-15 | — |
Field 22 references resolved against Field Map v0.2: LD-03 (LIVING_DEBATE); D2 (DOMAIN)
Cited by Living Debate versions
Research-of-record provenance
Materialized by sociolens-materializer 0.6.0 at 2026-09-28T20:00:00.000Z; normalization contract SocioLens — Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2 — Pre-Spike Materialization Contract (v1.0.2). Content seal SHA-256 dbae576e02a60ef6bb9578255d1a7b33350adbf815fe1b40db073394391bdc95.
Repository-authored inputs (not Drive exports)
- SocioLens claim — LD03-SL-C09 v1.0 (v1.0) — written in the SocioLens repository by Project Lead (Claude, AI) on 2026-10-15; no Drive identity exists. Authority: AGENTS.md "Authority" (the Project Lead decides research content within the research-integrity rules) and the Owner's choice in the SocioLens project chat on 15 October 2026 to build the LD-03 debate; a new Claim, first version, written from the project's LD-03 source notes, checked against full texts or official abstracts. Block “ENTRY 09 — LD03-SL-C09” SHA-256
c30feeeeebdc7851075967ca25d88e990e6151b759d8a5c5175a0cf1f972db06; fixturefixtures/authored/claims/LD03-SL-C09--v1.0.
Builder decisions (not Drive data)
- VERSION = v1.0 — basis: Claim version taken from the repository-authored claim fixture version (SocioLens claim — LD03-SL-C09 v1.0); the first version of a new Claim of the LD-03 debate
- CURRENT_POINTER = true — basis: repository-authored claim "SocioLens claim — LD03-SL-C09 v1.0" (Project Lead (Claude, AI), 2026-10-15); basis: AGENTS.md "Authority" (the Project Lead decides research content within the research-integrity rules) and the Owner's choice in the SocioLens project chat on 15 October 2026 to build the LD-03 debate; a new Claim, first version, written from the project's LD-03 source notes, checked against full texts or official abstracts
- FIELD_6_SOURCE_REFERENCE = SRC-SL-MILLER-ET-AL-ICSE-2026--v1.0 — basis: field 6 of ENTRY 09 — LD03-SL-C09 cites "Miller, Choudhuri, Ulloa et al., “‘Maybe We Need Some More Examples:’ Individual and Team Drivers of Developer GenAI Tool Use,” Proceedings of ICSE 2026"; the only field-6 segment of this ClaimVersion's repository-authored ledger block.
- SOURCE_PROVENANCE_PIN = SRC-SL-MILLER-ET-AL-ICSE-2026--v1.0 — basis: explicit version-pinned public provenance of this ClaimVersion (Amendment v1.2 §6): the pinned field-6 Source record "Miller, Choudhuri, Ulloa et al., “‘Maybe We Need Some More Examples:’ Individual and Team Drivers of Developer GenAI Tool Use,” Proceedings of ICSE 2026".